[IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI

Gamble, Beth GambleB at si.edu
Mon Jul 8 18:58:25 CET 2019


Thanks Tim,

You are correct.  We handle the creation of the EZID and just publish them through IPT.  We don't utilize IPT to create our EZIDs.  Sorry I didn't realize you had already discussed this with Tom.

Beth  :-)

From: Tim Robertson <trobertson at gbif.org>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 2:53 PM
To: Gamble, Beth <GambleB at si.edu>; ipt at lists.gbif.org
Cc: Orrell, Thomas <Orrellt at si.edu>; Snyder, Rebecca <SNYDERR at si.edu>
Subject: Re: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI

Hi Beth

I had a long call with Thomas Orrell about your case. I understood from that, the SI put ARKs (through EZID) on your records, assets and datasets in upstream systems which will still operate normally with an IPT (i.e. you map them to your occurrenceID). The IPT can be configured to issue dataset level identifiers by authenticating directly with EZID. It is that integration we believe now has issue but is not being used to our knowledge. Please say if you think otherwise though.

Thanks
Tim

Get Outlook for iOS<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fo0ukef&data=02%7C01%7CGambleB%40si.edu%7Ca8aed264ffd74f1feeb608d703d5790d%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C636982087717836283&sdata=XZoObV3khc8nF7TL0xdCHrP5D3V5Bevpt9PVlDewgJM%3D&reserved=0>
________________________________
From: IPT <ipt-bounces at lists.gbif.org<mailto:ipt-bounces at lists.gbif.org>> on behalf of Gamble, Beth <GambleB at si.edu<mailto:GambleB at si.edu>>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 8:33:22 PM
To: ipt at lists.gbif.org<mailto:ipt at lists.gbif.org>
Cc: Orrell, Thomas; Snyder, Rebecca
Subject: Re: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI

Hello Tim,

The Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) uses EZIDs as our unique identifiers.  What EZID capability are you removing from IPT?

Beth  :-)

Beth Gamble
Senior Systems Analyst
IT - Informatics Office
w 202.633.0851  e gambleb at si.edu<mailto:gambleb at si.edu>

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Facebook  |  Twitter  |  Instagram

-----Original Message-----

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:38:01 +0000
From: Tim Robertson <trobertson at gbif.org<mailto:trobertson at gbif.org>>
To: "ipt at lists.gbif.org<mailto:ipt at lists.gbif.org>" <ipt at lists.gbif.org<mailto:ipt at lists.gbif.org>>
Cc: informatics <informatics at gbif.org<mailto:informatics at gbif.org>>
Subject: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI
Message-ID: <E8F22A9E-D94A-430E-AE4A-BB7138ADB521 at gbif.org<mailto:E8F22A9E-D94A-430E-AE4A-BB7138ADB521 at gbif.org>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Dear all,

This email only affects those of you using DOI or EZID directly with your IPT.

The next release of the IPT will be prepared to accommodate recent changes in the DataCite API who have deprecated their public API.

In addition we are aware that EZID have reduced their capabilities with respect to DOIs. We are not aware of anyone using EZID as an identity service for ARKs.
We therefore propose to remove EZID capabilities from the IPT 2.4 release as we are not aware that it is in use by anyone.

If you are using EZID with your IPT can you please let me know asap and elaborate on which identifier scheme you are using so we can reconsider?

Many thanks,
Tim

_______________________________________________
IPT mailing list
IPT at lists.gbif.org<mailto:IPT at lists.gbif.org>
https://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/ipt<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.gbif.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fipt&data=02%7C01%7CGambleB%40si.edu%7Ca8aed264ffd74f1feeb608d703d5790d%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C636982087717836283&sdata=hdADAL0vOolLD0K7zdWkz6EyPbWSvYmtB1Q4g7J3N3k%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/ipt/attachments/20190708/e915c98c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the IPT mailing list