[IPT] (no subject)

[Dimitri Brosens]

Dear,

I was wondering, in DwC it is stated:

*Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as the
list of Darwin Core classes. Examples: "PreservedSpecimen",
"FossilSpecimen", "LivingSpecimen", "HumanObservation",
"MachineObservation". For discussion
see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:basisOfRecord
<http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:basisOfRecord>*

As far as I understand, this is not mandatory and we have been using terms
which are not in the 'supposed' controlled vocabulary on the tdwg site....


Publishing version #22.1 of resource belgian-coccinellidae-inbo-occurrences
failed: Archive generation for resource
belgian-coccinellidae-inbo-occurrences failed: Can't validate DwC-A for
resource belgian-coccinellidae-inbo-occurrences. Each row in the occurrence
file(s) must have a basisOfRecord, and each basisOfRecord must match the
Darwin Core Type Vocabulary (please note comparisons are case insensitive)
Continue to resource overview.

My problem is that IPT refuses to republish my previously published
datasets where we use terms like: 'literatureObservation' , 'literature',
fieldObservation or 'unknown

What to do?

Chrs,
Dimi

-- 

Belgian Biodiversity Platform

Dimitri Brosens

Biodiversity Research Liaison Officer

Research Institute for Nature and Forest
Kliniekstraat 25
1070 Brussels

ORCID: 0000-0002-0846-9116

www.inbo.be
www.biodiversity.be
www.beescommunity.be
*WATCH OUR BELGIAN BIODIVERSITY PLATFORM MOVIES ON:*
http://vimeo.com/114955090 (data publication activities)
http://vimeo.com/114955160 (science-policy activities)
http://vimeo.com/114955193 (our general mission)




 <http://www.biodiversity.be/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/ipt/attachments/20150625/df60cd8e/attachment.html>