[API-users] explanation for unlikely interpretations?

[Markus Döring]

Hi Ken-ichi,
this indeed is a bug in our code and I have created an issue with explanations for it here:
http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2444

Hope to get his fixed soon. 
Thanks for reporting!

Markus


On 08 Sep 2014, at 19:29, Ken-ichi <kenichi.ueda at gmail.com> wrote:

> When viewing many (most?) of the iNat records on GBIF, I see a yellow
> box at the top of the page listing some "Interpretation Issues." Some
> of them I understand, like derived country, since iNat doesn't report
> the country, just the coordinates, but the following are more opaque:
> 
> * Recorded date unlikely
> * Modified date unlikely
> * Identified date unlikely
> 
> Here's an example: http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/923925309. As far as
> I know, all three dates are accurate for that record. Why does GBIF
> think they're "unlikely"?
> 
> I suppose this is only tangentially related to the API, so if I should
> be directing this elsewhere please let me know.
> 
> -ken-ichi
> _______________________________________________
> API-users mailing list
> API-users at lists.gbif.org
> http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/api-users/attachments/20140909/92a1ed6c/attachment.html