<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Hi Ken-ichi,<div>this indeed is a bug in our code and I have created an issue with explanations for it here:</div><div><a href="http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2444">http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2444</a></div><div><br></div><div>Hope to get his fixed soon. </div><div>Thanks for reporting!</div><div><br></div><div>Markus</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On 08 Sep 2014, at 19:29, Ken-ichi <<a href="mailto:kenichi.ueda@gmail.com">kenichi.ueda@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">When viewing many (most?) of the iNat records on GBIF, I see a yellow<br>box at the top of the page listing some "Interpretation Issues." Some<br>of them I understand, like derived country, since iNat doesn't report<br>the country, just the coordinates, but the following are more opaque:<br><br>* Recorded date unlikely<br>* Modified date unlikely<br>* Identified date unlikely<br><br>Here's an example: <a href="http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/923925309">http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/923925309</a>. As far as<br>I know, all three dates are accurate for that record. Why does GBIF<br>think they're "unlikely"?<br><br>I suppose this is only tangentially related to the API, so if I should<br>be directing this elsewhere please let me know.<br><br>-ken-ichi<br>_______________________________________________<br>API-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org">API-users@lists.gbif.org</a><br>http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users<br><br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>