data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a68a/6a68abcf6a858b02cb788eab3e27ffa109e2fb2d" alt=""
Hi Ken-ichi, this indeed is a bug in our code and I have created an issue with explanations for it here: http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2444 Hope to get his fixed soon. Thanks for reporting! Markus On 08 Sep 2014, at 19:29, Ken-ichi <kenichi.ueda@gmail.com> wrote:
When viewing many (most?) of the iNat records on GBIF, I see a yellow box at the top of the page listing some "Interpretation Issues." Some of them I understand, like derived country, since iNat doesn't report the country, just the coordinates, but the following are more opaque:
* Recorded date unlikely * Modified date unlikely * Identified date unlikely
Here's an example: http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/923925309. As far as I know, all three dates are accurate for that record. Why does GBIF think they're "unlikely"?
I suppose this is only tangentially related to the API, so if I should be directing this elsewhere please let me know.
-ken-ichi _______________________________________________ API-users mailing list API-users@lists.gbif.org http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users