Thanks Santiago.
The released version of the collectory was actually 1.1.1. I can see you¹ve got the snapshot version 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT running (if you view source the version is in the header). I don¹t think there are any commits for 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT (yet), but we are trying to discourage folks from using snapshots and rely on the releases.
1) Heres the same page on the demo site with 1.1.1: http://ala-demo.gbif.org/collectory/datasets/
The problem has been caused by setting the configuration variable ³ala.baseURL² to "http://datos.gbif.es%C2%B2 instead of "http://www.ala.org.au"
ALA-DEMO version: <script src="http://www.ala.org.au/wp-content/themes/ala2011/scripts/jquery.autocom plete.js" type="text/javascript" ></script>
ES version: <script src="http://datos.gbif.es/wp-content/themes/ala2011/scripts/jquery.autocomp lete.js" type="text/javascript" ></script>
We have plans to remove this import from the collectory, but in the meantime to fix the problem, switch to ala.baseURL=http://www.ala.org.au
2) To answer the specific questions:
- Is it necessary the use of these provider maps to create the relations?
Yes.
- Could you explain how works this matching code?
During the processing, when the biocache code encounters a new combination of institution code and collection code, it calls the collectory like so:
Example record: http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/6a5c6786-9794-460d-8335-093540 9b999c
collectionCode=ADIMAN-FLORA institutionCode=ADIMAN
dataResourceUid=dr66
Web service lookup: http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/ws/lookup/inst/ADIMAN/coll/ADIMAN-FLORA
To be clear, the provider map codes should NOT be UIDs like ³co1² or ³in1². Provider map codes should be values that you are seeing in the raw data e.g. ADIMAN.
I think this is an example problem record:
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/9e59738e-56f9-41ea-ba64-106d65 1c0560
collectionCode=ADIMAN-MANCHUELA-2007 institutionCode=ADIMAN dataResourceUid=dr40
Web service lookup: http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/ws/lookup/inst/ADIMAN/coll/ADIMAN-MANCHUELA -2007
So currently there isn¹t a mapping in place for that combination. I suspect what has happened is there have been changes to collectory configuration for these resources after the data was originally loaded + processed.
To be clear, if you make changes in the collectory mappings (provider codes, resource consumers etc), these will NOT be picked up in the searching until you re-run processing & indexing like so:
biocache process -dr dr66 biocache index -dr dr66
Hope this helps,
Dave
On 13/09/2014 12:18 am, "Santiago Martinez de la Riva" sama@gbif.es wrote:
Hi all,
I updated our collectory module with the last release, collectory 1.1.2. And I found two issues that I would like to comment you.
In this url the datasets are never loaded. You can see in the Firebug that the page has 3 erros, one of these is the next:
TypeError: jQuery(...).autocomplete is not a function selectFirst: false
/collec...tasets/ (línea 70, col 16)
- ADDING RESOURCES / COLLECTION / INSTITUTION:
http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/in1
In this context, we have one Institution (in1) that has 2 collections. Now I'm goin to explain the procedure that I do to create these relations:
The first thing that I do is upload the resource, and after, I create the entities for that collection and that instution. In this moment, I edit the data resource and the collection for creating the relations:
- The first collection "Inventario Fauna Vertebrada de la Manchuela
Conquense (CUENCA), 2007 (ADIMAN-MANCHUELA-2007)" is related to the data resource "dr40" that has 2.790, the collection code is ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007 and the internal code/id is co3. The record consumer of the data resource "dr40" are co3 and in1. (image_1) but when I create the relation between this collection and the institution, the record cosumer are (view image_2)
- The second collection "Inventario de Flora y Vegetación del Municipio
de Enguídanos (Cuenca), 2010 (ADIMAN-FLORA)" is related to the data resource "dr66" that has 5.291 records. The collection code is ADIMAN-FLORA and the internal code/id is co2. The record consumer of the data resource "dr66" are co2 and in1. (image_3) but when I create the relation between this collection and the institution the record cosumer are: (view image_4)
I think that in both cases, image_2 and image_4, are wrong, because, how is it possible that one collection contributes with digitised records to the other? This doesn't make sense.
When I have created this structure, then I do the ingest of these resource: ingest -dr dr40 ingest -dr dr66
But, what is my surprise that when I access to the page of each resource, I see that the total records of ADIMAN-MANCHUELA-2007 is the sum of the record of both collections, and ADIMAN-FLORA doesn't have records. You can see this in this links:
- http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/co3 (ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007)
- http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/co2 (ADMINA-FLORA)
I can also create the provider Map for both cases, but I don't exactly know, if the provider codes have to be the internal codes like: in1, co2 and co3 or the orginal codes like ADMIN, ADIMAN-FLORA and ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007. In the image_5 and image_6, you can see the ProviderMap for this case. Two question?
- Is it necessary the use of these provider maps to create the relations?
- Could you explain how works this matching code?
I mean, It's possible that in one collection we have two collection codes, For example: in ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007 we have other collection code that is ADIMAN-CENSOAVUTARDA-2008. I figure up that I can define these rules with the parameters: "exact" and "Match Any Collection Code". Is right?
Thanks so much for the help and sorry for this long message.
PD: I'm working also with the i18n, and soon we will have translated and implemented all the variables in the project. You can see some advance in this link http://datos.gbif.es/collectory, I have had to edit some javascripts to do all the translation.
Santiago Martínez de la Riva GBIF.ES, Unidad de Coordinación Tel. +34 91 4203017 x 273 Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC Fax +34 91 429 2405 Plaza de Murillo, 2 sama@gbif.es 28014 Madrid, Spain www.gbif.es