[API-users] Canonical name of subgenus and species under a subgenus

[Markus Döring]

Hi James,

unfortunately 6.1 only applies if the subgenus is part of a bi/trinonmial.
If the name itself IS the subgenus it is apparenlty valid. For sure its common practice even for recently published names:
http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/45E20811-FEC5-4DBF-B7CB-D39AC32A8BFF

Markus


On 01 Feb 2016, at 12:42, Nozomi James Ytow <nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp<mailto:nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp>> wrote:

Oops.

From: Nozomi "James" Ytow <nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp<mailto:nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp>>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:36:53 +0900 (JST)

It imiles that Ficus (Diconoficus) could be a scientific name only as a part of binomen or trinomen, e.g. Ficus (Diconoficus) gayana.

It implies, I meant.

James
_______________________________________________
API-users mailing list
API-users at lists.gbif.org<mailto:API-users at lists.gbif.org>
http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/api-users/attachments/20160201/edb03696/attachment.html>