[API-users] Canonical name of subgenus and species under a subgenus
mdoering at gbif.org
Mon Feb 1 11:49:57 CET 2016
this indeed is a problem of our name parser. Actually this is a rather tricky problem as a zoological subgenus notation using brackets is
nearly impossible to tell apart from a genus name with an original author.
We refactored the name parser some time ago to take the rank of a name into account to be able to differ between those 2 options:
But it seems we have some outdated data hanging around here.
The parser returns the correct canonical even without the rank given:
Ill try to reparse all names in checklist bank.
On 01 Feb 2016, at 09:22, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>> wrote:
Looks like the issue is with GBIF’s handling of data, rather than the data source itself.
For the subgenus we have http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/100969508:
so the subgenus has mistakenly been treated as the authorship of the name.
For the species, GBIF ignores subgenera and so regards Ficus gayana as the canonical name.
Professor of Taxonomy
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences
Graham Kerr Building
University of Glasgow
Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Email: Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>
Tel: +44 141 330 4778
On 31 Jan 2016, at 23:32, Nozomi James Ytow <nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp<mailto:nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp>> wrote:
API-users mailing list
API-users at lists.gbif.org<mailto:API-users at lists.gbif.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the API-users