[Ala-portal] DATASETS and MANAGE RESOURCES / COLLECTION AND INSTITUTION
Santiago Martinez de la Riva
sama at gbif.es
Wed Sep 17 09:02:26 CEST 2014
Hi Dave,
In the point one, I mean that when the user wants to filter the datasets by some words, the javascript "dataset.js" executes always the next code and this is a problem because, the searches always point to:
In this case I have done a search in the vagrant machine 10.1.1.2 with the word "universidad" and the response is this json request:
http://bie.ala.org.au/search.json?q=universidad&fq=idxtype:DATASET&pageSize=1000&sort=name&callback=jQuery171022993668541156054_1410936808886&_=1410937071339
It's obviously that this works in your demo-ala but not work in my case, because the datasets that I want to filter, are not in bie.ala.org.au.
DATASET.JS
function filterList() {
// clear list of data sets
clearList();
// clear search term
$('#dr-search').val('');
// revert to full list
resources = allResources;
// aggregate all search criteria
var searchTerms = [];
$.each(currentFilters, function(i, obj) {
if (obj.name == 'contains') {
searchTerms.push(obj.value.toLowerCase());
}
});
// perform any solr search and wait for result
if (searchTerms.length > 0) {
$('.collectory-content').css('cursor','wait');
// build query string from terms
var query = '';
$.each(searchTerms, function(i, term) {
query += (i == 0) ? term : "&fq=text:" + term
});
// do search
HERE---------> $.ajax({url:"http://bie.ala.org.au/search.json?q=" + query + "&fq=idxtype:DATASET&pageSize=1000&sort=name",
dataType:'jsonp',
success: function(data) {
var uids = extractListOfUidsFromSearchResults(data);
applyFilters(uids);
$('.collectory-content').css('cursor','default');
}
});
}
// no search - so just do it now
else {
// do it now
applyFilters();
}
}
Kind regards
Santi
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Santiago Martínez de la Riva
GBIF.ES, Unidad de Coordinación Tel. +34 91 4203017 x 273
Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC Fax +34 91 429 2405
Plaza de Murillo, 2 sama at gbif.es
28014 Madrid, Spain www.gbif.es
________________________________________
De: David.Martin at csiro.au [David.Martin at csiro.au]
Enviado el: lunes, 15 de septiembre de 2014 4:07
Para: Santiago Martinez de la Riva; ala-portal at lists.gbif.org
Asunto: Re: [Ala-portal] DATASETS and MANAGE RESOURCES / COLLECTION AND INSTITUTION
Thanks Santiago.
The released version of the collectory was actually 1.1.1. I can see
you¹ve got the snapshot version 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT running (if you view source
the version is in the header).
I don¹t think there are any commits for 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT (yet), but we are
trying to discourage folks from using snapshots and rely on the releases.
1) Heres the same page on the demo site with 1.1.1:
http://ala-demo.gbif.org/collectory/datasets/
The problem has been caused by setting the configuration variable
³ala.baseURL² to "http://datos.gbif.es² instead of "http://www.ala.org.au"
ALA-DEMO version:
<script
src="http://www.ala.org.au/wp-content/themes/ala2011/scripts/jquery.autocom
plete.js" type="text/javascript" ></script>
ES version:
<script
src="http://datos.gbif.es/wp-content/themes/ala2011/scripts/jquery.autocomp
lete.js" type="text/javascript" ></script>
We have plans to remove this import from the collectory, but in the
meantime to fix the problem, switch to ala.baseURL=http://www.ala.org.au
2) To answer the specific questions:
- Is it necessary the use of these provider maps to create the relations?
Yes.
- Could you explain how works this matching code?
During the processing, when the biocache code encounters a new combination
of institution code and collection code, it calls the collectory like so:
Example record:
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/6a5c6786-9794-460d-8335-093540
9b999c
collectionCode=ADIMAN-FLORA
institutionCode=ADIMAN
dataResourceUid=dr66
Web service lookup:
http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/ws/lookup/inst/ADIMAN/coll/ADIMAN-FLORA
To be clear, the provider map codes should NOT be UIDs like ³co1² or
³in1². Provider map codes should be values that you are seeing in the raw
data e.g. ADIMAN.
I think this is an example problem record:
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/9e59738e-56f9-41ea-ba64-106d65
1c0560
collectionCode=ADIMAN-MANCHUELA-2007
institutionCode=ADIMAN
dataResourceUid=dr40
Web service lookup:
http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/ws/lookup/inst/ADIMAN/coll/ADIMAN-MANCHUELA
-2007
So currently there isn¹t a mapping in place for that combination. I
suspect what has happened is there have been changes to collectory
configuration for these resources after the data was originally loaded +
processed.
To be clear, if you make changes in the collectory mappings (provider
codes, resource consumers etc), these will NOT be picked up in the
searching until you re-run processing & indexing like so:
biocache process -dr dr66
biocache index -dr dr66
Hope this helps,
Dave
On 13/09/2014 12:18 am, "Santiago Martinez de la Riva" <sama at gbif.es>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I updated our collectory module with the last release, collectory 1.1.2.
>And I found two issues that I would like to comment you.
>
>1) DATASETS: http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/datasets/
>
>In this url the datasets are never loaded. You can see in the Firebug
>that the page has 3 erros, one of these is the next:
>
>TypeError: jQuery(...).autocomplete is not a function
>selectFirst: false
>
>/collec...tasets/ (línea 70, col 16)
>
>2) ADDING RESOURCES / COLLECTION / INSTITUTION:
>http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/in1
>
>In this context, we have one Institution (in1) that has 2 collections.
>Now I'm goin to explain the procedure that I do to create these relations:
>
>The first thing that I do is upload the resource, and after, I create
>the entities for that collection and that instution. In this moment, I
>edit the data resource and the collection for creating the relations:
>
>- The first collection "Inventario Fauna Vertebrada de la Manchuela
>Conquense (CUENCA), 2007 (ADIMAN-MANCHUELA-2007)" is related to the data
>resource "dr40" that has 2.790, the collection code is
>ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007 and the internal code/id is co3.
> The record consumer of the data resource "dr40" are co3 and in1.
>(image_1)
> but when I create the relation between this collection and the
>institution, the record cosumer are (view image_2)
>
>- The second collection "Inventario de Flora y Vegetación del Municipio
>de Enguídanos (Cuenca), 2010 (ADIMAN-FLORA)" is related to the data
>resource "dr66" that has 5.291 records. The collection code is
>ADIMAN-FLORA and the internal code/id is co2.
> The record consumer of the data resource "dr66" are co2 and in1.
>(image_3)
> but when I create the relation between this collection and the
>institution the record cosumer are: (view image_4)
>
>I think that in both cases, image_2 and image_4, are wrong, because, how
>is it possible that one collection contributes with digitised records to
>the other? This doesn't make sense.
>
>When I have created this structure, then I do the ingest of these
>resource:
>ingest -dr dr40
>ingest -dr dr66
>
>But, what is my surprise that when I access to the page of each resource,
>I see that the total records of ADIMAN-MANCHUELA-2007 is the sum of the
>record of both collections, and ADIMAN-FLORA doesn't have records.
>You can see this in this links:
>- http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/co3 (ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007)
>- http://datos.gbif.es/collectory/public/show/co2 (ADMINA-FLORA)
>
>
>I can also create the provider Map for both cases, but I don't exactly
>know, if the provider codes have to be the internal codes like: in1, co2
>and co3 or the orginal codes like ADMIN, ADIMAN-FLORA and
>ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007. In the image_5 and image_6, you can see the
>ProviderMap for this case. Two question?
> - Is it necessary the use of these provider maps to create the relations?
> - Could you explain how works this matching code?
>I mean, It's possible that in one collection we have two collection
>codes, For example: in ADIMAN-MACHUELA-2007 we have other collection code
>that is ADIMAN-CENSOAVUTARDA-2008. I figure up that I can define these
>rules with the parameters: "exact" and "Match Any Collection Code". Is
>right?
>
>
>Thanks so much for the help and sorry for this long message.
>
>PD: I'm working also with the i18n, and soon we will have translated and
>implemented all the variables in the project. You can see some advance in
>this link http://datos.gbif.es/collectory, I have had to edit some
>javascripts to do all the translation.
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------
>Santiago Martínez de la Riva
>GBIF.ES, Unidad de Coordinación Tel. +34 91 4203017 x 273
>Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC Fax +34 91 429 2405
>Plaza de Murillo, 2 sama at gbif.es
>28014 Madrid, Spain www.gbif.es
More information about the Ala-portal
mailing list