Hello Tim,
The Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) uses EZIDs as our unique identifiers. What EZID capability are you removing from IPT?
Beth :-)
Beth Gamble Senior Systems Analyst IT - Informatics Office w 202.633.0851 e gambleb@si.edu
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
-----Original Message-----
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:38:01 +0000 From: Tim Robertson trobertson@gbif.org To: "ipt@lists.gbif.org" ipt@lists.gbif.org Cc: informatics informatics@gbif.org Subject: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI Message-ID: E8F22A9E-D94A-430E-AE4A-BB7138ADB521@gbif.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear all,
This email only affects those of you using DOI or EZID directly with your IPT.
The next release of the IPT will be prepared to accommodate recent changes in the DataCite API who have deprecated their public API.
In addition we are aware that EZID have reduced their capabilities with respect to DOIs. We are not aware of anyone using EZID as an identity service for ARKs. We therefore propose to remove EZID capabilities from the IPT 2.4 release as we are not aware that it is in use by anyone.
If you are using EZID with your IPT can you please let me know asap and elaborate on which identifier scheme you are using so we can reconsider?
Many thanks, Tim
Hi Beth
I had a long call with Thomas Orrell about your case. I understood from that, the SI put ARKs (through EZID) on your records, assets and datasets in upstream systems which will still operate normally with an IPT (i.e. you map them to your occurrenceID). The IPT can be configured to issue dataset level identifiers by authenticating directly with EZID. It is that integration we believe now has issue but is not being used to our knowledge. Please say if you think otherwise though.
Thanks Tim
Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef ________________________________ From: IPT ipt-bounces@lists.gbif.org on behalf of Gamble, Beth GambleB@si.edu Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 8:33:22 PM To: ipt@lists.gbif.org Cc: Orrell, Thomas; Snyder, Rebecca Subject: Re: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI
Hello Tim,
The Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) uses EZIDs as our unique identifiers. What EZID capability are you removing from IPT?
Beth :-)
Beth Gamble Senior Systems Analyst IT - Informatics Office w 202.633.0851 e gambleb@si.edu
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
-----Original Message-----
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:38:01 +0000 From: Tim Robertson trobertson@gbif.org To: "ipt@lists.gbif.org" ipt@lists.gbif.org Cc: informatics informatics@gbif.org Subject: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI Message-ID: E8F22A9E-D94A-430E-AE4A-BB7138ADB521@gbif.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear all,
This email only affects those of you using DOI or EZID directly with your IPT.
The next release of the IPT will be prepared to accommodate recent changes in the DataCite API who have deprecated their public API.
In addition we are aware that EZID have reduced their capabilities with respect to DOIs. We are not aware of anyone using EZID as an identity service for ARKs. We therefore propose to remove EZID capabilities from the IPT 2.4 release as we are not aware that it is in use by anyone.
If you are using EZID with your IPT can you please let me know asap and elaborate on which identifier scheme you are using so we can reconsider?
Many thanks, Tim
_______________________________________________ IPT mailing list IPT@lists.gbif.org https://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/ipt
Thanks Tim,
You are correct. We handle the creation of the EZID and just publish them through IPT. We don't utilize IPT to create our EZIDs. Sorry I didn't realize you had already discussed this with Tom.
Beth :-)
From: Tim Robertson trobertson@gbif.org Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 2:53 PM To: Gamble, Beth GambleB@si.edu; ipt@lists.gbif.org Cc: Orrell, Thomas Orrellt@si.edu; Snyder, Rebecca SNYDERR@si.edu Subject: Re: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI
Hi Beth
I had a long call with Thomas Orrell about your case. I understood from that, the SI put ARKs (through EZID) on your records, assets and datasets in upstream systems which will still operate normally with an IPT (i.e. you map them to your occurrenceID). The IPT can be configured to issue dataset level identifiers by authenticating directly with EZID. It is that integration we believe now has issue but is not being used to our knowledge. Please say if you think otherwise though.
Thanks Tim
Get Outlook for iOShttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fo0ukef&data=02%7C01%7CGambleB%40si.edu%7Ca8aed264ffd74f1feeb608d703d5790d%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C636982087717836283&sdata=XZoObV3khc8nF7TL0xdCHrP5D3V5Bevpt9PVlDewgJM%3D&reserved=0 ________________________________ From: IPT <ipt-bounces@lists.gbif.orgmailto:ipt-bounces@lists.gbif.org> on behalf of Gamble, Beth <GambleB@si.edumailto:GambleB@si.edu> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 8:33:22 PM To: ipt@lists.gbif.orgmailto:ipt@lists.gbif.org Cc: Orrell, Thomas; Snyder, Rebecca Subject: Re: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI
Hello Tim,
The Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) uses EZIDs as our unique identifiers. What EZID capability are you removing from IPT?
Beth :-)
Beth Gamble Senior Systems Analyst IT - Informatics Office w 202.633.0851 e gambleb@si.edumailto:gambleb@si.edu
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
-----Original Message-----
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:38:01 +0000 From: Tim Robertson <trobertson@gbif.orgmailto:trobertson@gbif.org> To: "ipt@lists.gbif.orgmailto:ipt@lists.gbif.org" <ipt@lists.gbif.orgmailto:ipt@lists.gbif.org> Cc: informatics <informatics@gbif.orgmailto:informatics@gbif.org> Subject: [IPT] EZID, ARK and DOI Message-ID: <E8F22A9E-D94A-430E-AE4A-BB7138ADB521@gbif.orgmailto:E8F22A9E-D94A-430E-AE4A-BB7138ADB521@gbif.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear all,
This email only affects those of you using DOI or EZID directly with your IPT.
The next release of the IPT will be prepared to accommodate recent changes in the DataCite API who have deprecated their public API.
In addition we are aware that EZID have reduced their capabilities with respect to DOIs. We are not aware of anyone using EZID as an identity service for ARKs. We therefore propose to remove EZID capabilities from the IPT 2.4 release as we are not aware that it is in use by anyone.
If you are using EZID with your IPT can you please let me know asap and elaborate on which identifier scheme you are using so we can reconsider?
Many thanks, Tim
_______________________________________________ IPT mailing list IPT@lists.gbif.orgmailto:IPT@lists.gbif.org https://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/ipthttps://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.gbif.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fipt&data=02%7C01%7CGambleB%40si.edu%7Ca8aed264ffd74f1feeb608d703d5790d%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C636982087717836283&sdata=hdADAL0vOolLD0K7zdWkz6EyPbWSvYmtB1Q4g7J3N3k%3D&reserved=0
participants (2)
-
Gamble, Beth -
Tim Robertson