Dear Gabi,
I'm sorry for the inconvenience this issue has caused you.
This issue has already been captured (see here), and will be fixed for version 2.2 that gets released in October/November.
I promised to prepare a snapshot version for you fixing the other bug you reported in May. How about I prepare a snapshot version for you that fixes both these problems? I can work on that this week. That way you can continue using the IPT in combination with the HIT.
With kind regards,
Kyle
On Aug 19, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Dröge, Gabriele wrote:
Hi everyone,
I’m using IPT Version 2.1.1-r4640 with several extensions and I am wondering why my meta.xml looks different from others.
Usually for the extensions there is just a row <coreid index=”0”> But in my meta.xml there is a second one <field term=”http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/occurenceID”>
I’ve attached both meta.xml-files (taken from a GBIF provider).
HIT seems to have some problems with it, so do you have any idea why my meta.xml looks like this?
Best, Gabi
<meta_normal.xml><meta_strange.xml>_______________________________________________ IPT mailing list IPT@lists.gbif.org http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/ipt