Hi,
I already looked at both of the git project. Looks interesting. Is I am more "pythonic" the idb-backend is easier to adapt for me. Thanks for showing me. I was hoping that someone already addressed the question as it seemed to me quite obviously to provide the data in a widely used format like sql. I have the feeling I am reenventing the wheel ;-)
The "B-HIT" tool seems to be a reasonable alternative to get a the desired data into an sql data base. In case you are interested, have a look here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283543150_B-HIT_-_A_Tool_for_Harves... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636251/
Cheers Chris
Am 14.11.2016 um 17:40 schrieb Scott Chamberlain: Hi Chris, I started something a while back to automate building a SQLite version of the backbone taxonomy (https://github.com/ropensci/gbif-backbone-sql) but it's not quite done yet. Idea is to run on Heroku (e.g., once a day), resulting in a fresh SQLite version of the backbone taxonomy on Amazon S3.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:50 AM Markus Döring <mdoering@gbif.orgmailto:mdoering@gbif.org> wrote: Hi Chris, the latest GBIF backbone is always available as a Darwin Core archive. This is mostly a collection of tab delimited text files with the accepted and synonym names at its core. You can find the latest and previous, archived versions here: http://rs.gbif.org/datasets/backbone/
Best, Markus
-- Markus Döring Software Developer Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) mdoering@gbif.orgmailto:mdoering@gbif.org http://www.gbif.org
On 14 Nov 2016, at 16:42, Köhler Christian <C.Koehler@zfmk.demailto:C.Koehler@zfmk.de> wrote:
Hi,
we are developing an application to curate taxonomic and morphological data for scientists. At the moment we are evaluating different taxonomic backbones to be used within our application. The GIBF taxonomic backbone seems to be an good choice in regards to quality, number of entries and acceptance.
Due to the nature of our application, a web service to browse the taxonomy will not fulfil our requirements. A local copy of the GIBF data as SQL would be an ideal solution. I looked for this data publicly available to no avail. "Harvesting" the GBIF rest api seems not a good option. Are there plans to provide current taxonomic backbone data in the future? Maybe the data is already available, but I failed to find it yet.
Regards Chris
-- Christian Köhler Tel.: 0228 9122-434
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany www.zfmk.dehttp://www.zfmk.de
Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts Direktor: Prof. J. Wolfgang Wägele Sitz: Bonn -- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere - Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany www.zfmk.dehttp://www.zfmk.de
Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts; Direktor: Prof. J. Wolfgang Wägele Sitz: Bonn _______________________________________________ API-users mailing list API-users@lists.gbif.orgmailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users
_______________________________________________ API-users mailing list API-users@lists.gbif.orgmailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users
-- Christian Köhler Tel.: 0228 9122-434
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany www.zfmk.dehttp://www.zfmk.de
Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts Direktor: Prof. J. Wolfgang Wägele Sitz: Bonn
-- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere - Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany www.zfmk.de
Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts; Direktor: Prof. J. Wolfgang Wägele Sitz: Bonn