Hi,
this indeed is a problem of our name parser. Actually this is a rather tricky problem as a zoological subgenus notation using brackets is 
nearly impossible to tell apart from a genus name with an original author.

We refactored the name parser some time ago to take the rank of a name into account to be able to differ between those 2 options:
http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2624

But it seems we have some outdated data hanging around here.
The parser returns the correct canonical even without the rank given:
http://api.gbif.org/v1/parser/name?name=Ficus%20(Diconoficus)


Ill try to reparse all names in checklist bank.

Markus


On 01 Feb 2016, at 09:22, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page@glasgow.ac.uk> wrote:

Looks like the issue is with GBIF’s handling of data, rather than the data source itself.

For the subgenus we have http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/100969508:

"scientificName":"Ficus (Diconoficus)”,
"canonicalName":”Ficus”,
"authorship":" (Diconoficus)”

so the subgenus has mistakenly been treated as the authorship of the name. 

For the species, GBIF ignores subgenera and so regards Ficus gayana as the canonical name.

Regards

Rod

---------------------------------------------------------
Roderic Page
Professor of Taxonomy
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences
Graham Kerr Building
University of Glasgow
Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Email:  Roderic.Page@glasgow.ac.uk
Tel:  +44 141 330 4778
Skype:  rdmpage
Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/rdmpage
LinkedIn:  http://uk.linkedin.com/in/rdmpage
Twitter:  http://twitter.com/rdmpage
Blog:  http://iphylo.blogspot.com
ORCID:  http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-9767

On 31 Jan 2016, at 23:32, Nozomi James Ytow <nozomi@biol.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:

Diconoficus

_______________________________________________
API-users mailing list
API-users@lists.gbif.org
http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users