Hi Dave,
This is the issue that I commented with you during the meeting.
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/search?q=institution_uid%3Ain6 &fq=family%3ABufonidae&qc=&wkt=POLYGON((-5.284423828125+41.1290213474951,-2. 801513671875%2040.53050177574321,-2.362060546875%2041.672911819602085,-4.383 544921875%2042.06560675405716,-5.284423828125%2041.1290213474951))#tab_mapVi ew http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/search?q=institution_uid%3Ain6&... fq=family%3ABufonidae&qc=&wkt=POLYGON((-5.284423828125+41.1290213474951,-2.8 01513671875%2040.53050177574321,-2.362060546875%2041.672911819602085,-4.3835 44921875%2042.06560675405716,-5.284423828125%2041.1290213474951))#tab_mapVie w
The System detects 324 species, but in the statistics graphic, we can see that there are only two. Its very weird, I suppose that could be a problem or error in the name matching??
What do you think?
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/search?q=institution_uid%3Ain6 http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/search?q=institution_uid%3Ain6 &fq=family%3ABufonidae&qc=&wkt=POLYGON((-5.284423828125+41.1290213474951,-2. 801513671875%2040.53050177574321,-2.362060546875%2041.672911819602085,-4.383 544921875%2042.06560675405716,-5.284423828125%2041.1290213474951))#tab_chart sView &fq=family%3ABufonidae&qc=&wkt=POLYGON((-5.284423828125+41.1290213474951,-2. 801513671875%2040.53050177574321,-2.362060546875%2041.672911819602085,-4.383 544921875%2042.06560675405716,-5.284423828125%2041.1290213474951))#tab_chart sView
Thanks in advance,
Santi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Santiago Martínez de la Riva Responsable Desarrollo / IT GBIF España
GBIF.ES, Unidad de Coordinación Tel. +34 91 4203017 x 273
Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC Fax +34 91 429 2405
Plaza de Murillo, 2 sama@gbif.es; http://twitter.com/smr_sama
28014 Madrid, Spain http://www.gbif.es www.gbif.es ; http://datos.gbif.es http://datos.gbif.es
Thanks Santi.
Yes I can see the problem. Im not sure what the cause is but you might be right about it being the name matching index. We’ll look into it and report back to the list.
Thanks
Dave Martin ALA
On 11 May 2015, at 12:54 pm, Santiago <sama@gbif.esmailto:sama@gbif.es> wrote:
Hi Dave,
This is the issue that I commented with you during the meeting.
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/search?q=institution_uid%3Ain6&...
The System detects 324 species, but in the statistics graphic, we can see that there are only two. It’s very weird, I suppose that could be a problem or error in the name matching?? What do you think?
<image001.png>
http://datos.gbif.es/generic-hub/occurrences/search?q=institution_uid%3Ain6&...
<image002.png>
Thanks in advance, Santi. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santiago Martínez de la Riva – Responsable Desarrollo / IT – GBIF España
GBIF.ES, Unidad de Coordinación Tel. +34 91 4203017 x 273 Real Jardín Botánico - CSIC Fax +34 91 429 2405 Plaza de Murillo, 2 sama@gbif.esmailto:sama@gbif.es; http://twitter.com/smr_sama 28014 Madrid, Spain www.gbif.eshttp://www.gbif.es/ ; http://datos.gbif.eshttp://datos.gbif.es/ https://code.google.com/p/pliniancore/
participants (2)
-
David.Martin@csiro.au
-
Santiago