<div dir="ltr">Tim, <div><br></div><div>Thanks, I should have thought of that! </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, Scott</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Tim Robertson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:trobertson@gbif.org" target="_blank">trobertson@gbif.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Hi Scott</div><div><br></div><div>Occurrence record fields are elastic - we support the full DwC, but can only render from <a href="http://GBIF.org" target="_blank">GBIF.org</a> what is shared by the data publisher.</div><div><br></div>So that field will only appear on records where it is present - here is an example of a single record:<div> <a href="http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/675943831" target="_blank">http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/675943831</a></div><div><br></div><div>That record above is the interpreted view of the verbatim content we observed from the source:</div><div> <a href="http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/675943831/verbatim" target="_blank">http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/675943831/verbatim</a></div><div><br></div><div>It is also returned in a search (same dataset as record above):</div><div> <a href="http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/search?datasetKey=b6015b60-6f96-43a9-88e5-2f41854e8f07" target="_blank">http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/search?datasetKey=b6015b60-6f96-43a9-88e5-2f41854e8f07</a></div><div><br></div><div>I hope this helps,</div><div>Tim</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On 07 Oct 2014, at 20:48, Scott Chamberlain <<a href="mailto:scott@ropensci.org" target="_blank">scott@ropensci.org</a>> wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Hmmm...I don't see establishmentMeans anywhere in the returned data from the /occurrence . I do see documentation on it, endpoint <a href="https://code.google.com/p/darwincore/wiki/Occurrence#establishmentMeans" target="_blank">https://code.google.com/p/darwincore/wiki/Occurrence#establishmentMeans</a>, but is it included in data output anywhere? Maybe called something else?<div><br></div><div>S</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Scott Chamberlain <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scott@ropensci.org" target="_blank">scott@ropensci.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Alex, <div><br></div><div>Thanks, that's a good idea. I was thinking that there are a finite number of botanical gardens, so I could simply collect coordinates for each of them, and a reasonable bounding box around each one perhaps. </div><span><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Scott</div></font></span></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Thompson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:godfoder@acis.ufl.edu" target="_blank">godfoder@acis.ufl.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Also not something that can be done via the API, but botanical gardens<br>
will also tend to be fairly large locality outliers (large numbers of<br>
extremely tightly clustered points from relatively diverse taxa). Often,<br>
I've found, many gardens are all geo-referenced to a single reference<br>
locality, so you don't even need to do a bounding box filter, you can<br>
just filter out specific points.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
- Alex<br>
</font></span><div><br>
On 10/07/2014 10:47 AM, Tim Robertson wrote:<br>
> Hi Scott,<br>
><br>
> There is actually no easy way of doing this. Filtering out BasisOfRecord=LivingSpecimen would get you some of the way there, and looking into the establishmentMeans a step further, but the some of the data just don’t have fields to filter them out.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Tim<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 07 Oct 2014, at 03:00, Scott Chamberlain <<a href="mailto:myrmecocystus@gmail.com" target="_blank">myrmecocystus@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hello,<br>
>><br>
>> Someone brought up recently whether or not they could exclude observations from botanical gardens in GBIF occurrence searches. I think they meant just occurrences from within actual gardens, not observations from more natural areas in a database provided by a botanical garden.<br>
>><br>
>> Is something like this already flagged as an issue in the occurrence issue enum? I didn't see it myself. I guess one could find the data providers that are botanical gardens and exclude those if they are in the search results.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks for any guidance.<br>
>><br>
>> Cheers, Scott Chamberlain<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> API-users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org" target="_blank">API-users@lists.gbif.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users" target="_blank">http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> API-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org" target="_blank">API-users@lists.gbif.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users" target="_blank">http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
API-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org" target="_blank">API-users@lists.gbif.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users" target="_blank">http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>API-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:API-users@lists.gbif.org" target="_blank">API-users@lists.gbif.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users" target="_blank">http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>